Erratum to "State-morphism MV-algebras" [Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 161 (2009) 161-173]
نویسندگان
چکیده
Recently, the first two authors characterized in Di Nola and Dvurečenskij (2009) [1] subdirectly irreducible state-morphism MV-algebras. Unfortunately, the main theorem (Theorem 5.4(ii)) has a gap in the proof of Claim 10, as the example below shows. We now present a correct characterization and its correct proof. © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Generalizations of Boolean products for lattice-ordered algebras
It is shown that the Boolean center of complemented elements in a bounded integral residuated lattice characterizes direct decompositions. Generalizing both Boolean products and poset sums of residuated lattices, the concepts of poset product, Priestley product and Esakia product of algebras are defined and used to prove decomposition theorems for various ordered algebras. In particular, we sho...
متن کاملSTONE DUALITY FOR R0-ALGEBRAS WITH INTERNAL STATES
$Rsb{0}$-algebras, which were proved to be equivalent to Esteva and Godo's NM-algebras modelled by Fodor's nilpotent minimum t-norm, are the equivalent algebraic semantics of the left-continuous t-norm based fuzzy logic firstly introduced by Guo-jun Wang in the mid 1990s.In this paper, we first establish a Stone duality for the category of MV-skeletons of $Rsb{0}$-algebras and the category of t...
متن کاملDefinable principal congruences and solvability
We prove that in a locally finite variety that has definable principal congruences (DPC), solvable congruences are nilpotent, and strongly solvable congruences are strongly abelian. As a corollary of the arguments we obtain that in a congruence modular variety with DPC, every solvable algebra can be decomposed as a direct product of nilpotent algebras of prime power size.
متن کاملErratum to "On the reflection invariance of residuated chains" [Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 161 (2009) 220-227]
In Section 2 replace the definition of ∗◦Q in Definition 1 by x∗◦Q y = inf{u ∗◦ v | u > x, v > y}. It is defined only if the infimum exists. Proposition 1 remains unchanged. Theorem 0. Let (X, ∗◦,→∗◦,≤) be a commutative residuated semigroup on a complete chain equipped with the order topology. Let a, b, c ∈ X be such that a = b→∗◦ c. Let (x, y) ∈ X × X be such that 1. neither x nor y equals the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Ann. Pure Appl. Logic
دوره 161 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010